Responsible Or Terribly Wronged: Is Joe Bryan, In Jail For 30 Years, Harmless?
CLIFTON, TX — On October 15, 1985, common fourth-grade instructor Mickey Bryan, 44, was discovered murdered in her bed room in Clifton, Texas.
Mickey’s nightgown was pulled as much as the highest of her thighs. She was bare from the waist down, and there was blood splattered all around the partitions.
Her husband, beloved highschool principal Joe Bryan, was charged along with her homicide and has been behind bars for the previous 30 years.
The prosecution’s case towards him was largely circumstantial and relied largely on the testimony of a police detective educated in blood-spatter evaluation, Robert Thorman. Thorman, whereas boasting a powerful profession in legislation enforcement, had really solely been educated to research blood spatter 4 months earlier than Mickey’s homicide — in a 40-hour class. Whereas the district lawyer made positive the jury knew concerning the greater than twenty years Thorman had labored in legislation enforcement, he didn’t make a degree of how new he was to blood spatter evaluation.
This week’s New York Occasions Journal takes one other have a look at this crime — a traditional Investigation Discovery–kind story! — that shocked a small city, and investigates whether or not Joe Bryan could have been convicted as a result of poor police work and defective forensics.
In a case with a number of twists and turns, together with household secrets and techniques, questionable specialists, and lurid rumors of homosexuality — severe questions are raised concerning the integrity of 1 investigation in a small city.
The love story that may finish so violently had a candy begin. Mickey and Joe, who had identified one another since elementary faculty, married in 1969. Based on family and friends, they seemed to be completely satisfied and devoted to one another.
Each Joe and Mickey had been devoted lecturers, and so they moved to Clifton in 1975 after Joe was supplied the job of principal.
The couple might typically seen round city, strolling hand-in-hand and deep in dialog. Although each cherished youngsters, they had been by no means capable of have any of their very own.
On the scene, investigators had been below big stress to make an arrest in a small city the place violent crime was uncommon. Making the investigation extra complicated, nnother homicide — of a 17-year-old woman who had been sexually assaulted and suffocated 4 months earlier — was nonetheless unsolved, and scaring residents.
Detectives decided that Mickey had been shot 4 instances, as soon as within the stomach and 3 times within the head. As a result of tiny lead pellets that had been embedded in Mickey’s pores and skin, they developed a concept that she had been shot with a .357 pistol. Joe instructed detectives that he saved a .357 loaded with birdshot to shoot the snakes that typically got here into the yard.
When Joe voluntarily spoke to police — with no lawyer current — he claimed that he had final spoken to his spouse from his resort room the place he was staying for a convention at round 9 P.M. on Monday, October 14. He stated that they’d mentioned grading papers and the climate, and that nothing appeared out of the peculiar.
For him to have dedicated the homicide, he must have pushed 120 from the Hyatt through the night time, shot Mickey, pushed again to Austin, and gone again to his resort room earlier than the convention’s morning session, at which he was seen by a number of witnesses.
A couple of days later, Mickey’s older brother Charlie Blue, who had flown in from Florida, gave police a lead. Based on a sworn affidavit, Blue known as personal investigator Bud Saunders to ask for assist in investigating his sister’s dying.
Blue borrowed Joe’s automotive, which he drove for 4 days. Throughout this time, in accordance with Blue, he pulled over whereas Saunders was using with him in order that they may relieve themselves. He claimed that, whereas doing so, Saunders received mud on his boots, and that when he opened the trunk to search for one thing to scrub them with, he noticed a cardboard field containing a flashlight with “what appeared to me to be blood specks on the lens,” Blue wrote.
Blue stated that he and Saunders then drove again to the home and went inside earlier than driving to a pay telephone to name the Texas Rangers.
Based on the New York Occasions Journal, there have been components of the story that the Clifton Police Division ought to have investigated — together with why the boys went inside the house, and why they didn’t instantly name legislation enforcement.
Police executed a search warrant on the Mercury and located the flashlight. The specks on the flashlight lens had been decided to be human blood, kind O — the identical blood kind as Mickey’s, however not Joe’s.
On October 23, Joe was arrested and charged along with his spouse’s homicide. He was shunned by a lot of his outdated pals and Mickey’s household, and compelled to resign from his job as an educator — a transfer that reportedly devastated him.
Since there have been no eyewitnesses, no motive, and no conclusive proof, the prosecution primarily based nearly its complete case on the flashlight.
On the time, departments had been utilizing the comparatively new know-how of bloodstain-pattern evaluation — the examination of the form, dimension, location, and distribution of bloodstains — to assist resolve crimes.
Professional witness Thorman claimed that the actual sample on the flashlight lens was a sample generally known as “blowback or, as generally identified, again spatter” — which signified blood that had traveled backward at a excessive velocity, and indicated a taking pictures.
Joe’s fingerprints had been on the flashlight, however Joe acknowledged that this is able to have made sense as a result of the truth that the flashlight was his, however that he had final appear it within the bed room.
Different proof appeared to level away from Joe: Two human hairs discovered within the cardboard field within the trunk didn’t match both of the Bryans. Doubtlessly essentially the most important clue was an unidentified palm print on the headboard of the mattress that didn’t match Joe. However since Mickey’s palm prints had been taken incorrectly, they may not be used for comparability.
There was additionally the query of the reported $300,000 in insurance coverage cash that Mickey left behind. Had Blue, because the protection acknowledged at trial, made a declare for the cash? Might he have put the flashlight within the trunk?
At trial, Joe insisted he by no means left his resort room after he spoke with Mickey on the night of October 14, and that he had had nothing to do along with his spouse’s dying. However, nonetheless, the jury convicted him, and sentenced him to 99 years in jail.
In 1988, the case took one other unusual flip when Joe’s conviction was overturned on a technicality, and he was launched for a brief time frame. He was then tried once more, convicted once more, and as soon as once more sentenced to 99 years behind bars.
Now 77, Joe is presently incarcerated at Partitions Unit in Huntsville.
Half II of the yearlong investigation, which was performed in partnership with ProPublica, shall be printed in The New York Occasions Journal subsequent week.
Really useful For You:
Most important picture: Useless or unconscious girl’s hand motionless on picket ground [iStockPhoto]